Accessibility at Altitut

Last assessment

October 4, 2026

Standard evaluated against

WCAG 2.2 A / AA

Assessment type

Internal accessibility assessment

Scope

• Public authentication and account-entry pages
• Representative authenticated student workflows
• Desktop and narrow responsive layouts
• Automated axe-core checks
• Source and semantic review

Current result

Completed improvements

• Route-specific page titles
• Skip navigation link
• Primary main landmark
• Accessible names for icon controls
• Form and select labels
• Keyboard-focusable scroll regions
• Contrast improvements
• Responsive overflow checks

Known limitations

• Screen reader verification
• Complete keyboard workflow testing
• 400% zoom and reflow
• Dialog focus trapping and Escape behavior
• Captions and transcripts where applicable
• Drag-and-drop alternatives
• Module and session routes that require appropriate test data

Last assessment

October 4, 2026

Standard

WCAG 2.2 A / AA

Assessment type

Internal accessibility assessment

Scope

• Public instructor entry pages
• Representative authenticated instructor workflows
• Responsive checks
• Automated axe-core testing
• Source and semantic review

Public tested production routes currently have 0 automated axe violations.

Completed improvements

• Password visibility controls now have accessible names
• Timer control contrast
• Route-specific document titles
• Skip navigation
• Main landmark
• Accessible names on action buttons
• Contrast remediation
• Responsive overflow remediation

Known limitations

• One Contact custom-recipient close icon was later given an accessible name in production
• Help did not load in the production retest
• Screen reader verification
• Full keyboard workflows
• 400% zoom
• Dialog focus and Escape
• Class and session-specific routes
• Drag interactions where applicable

Last assessment

September 14, 2026

Standard

WCAG 2.1 AA, with 2.2 checks

Assessment type

Internal engineering assessment

Scope

Fourteen routes were reviewed in total. Eleven routes were exercised as part of the production automated testing sample. Three additional routes — live pitch, password reset, and presentation upload — were reviewed through source/code inspection only.

• Organizer sign-in, dashboard, competition list, overview, entries, judges, email campaign, results, and settings
• Student application on one closed competition, which showed interest registration rather than the full application
• Judge portal without a live judge assignment
• Code review of live pitch, password reset, and presentation upload

Production result

The September 14, 2026 production automated sample covered 11 pages. The login page had 0 axe violations. The remaining tested pages had 17 rule-level violations, affecting 39 nodes. The repeated failures were color contrast on status chips and small text, checkboxes without names, icon buttons without names, judge images without text alternatives, nested controls on judge cards, an unnamed progress bar, and an unnamed settings combobox.

Work prepared in source

• Names for icon buttons, checkboxes, the progress bar, and judge images
• Skip link, heading structure, focus indication, and required-field markup

Those source changes were not confirmed with a new production axe run. Status-chip contrast and drag-and-drop advancement were left unchanged.

Remaining verification

• A production retest after the source fixes are deployed
• Screen reader testing
• 400% zoom and reflow on dense tables
• An open student application and a judge session that uses a real assignment
• Keyboard alternatives for drag-and-drop advancement
• Captions for uploaded pitch video

These items remain before Altitut Competition is evaluated for a formal VPAT-based Accessibility Conformance Report.

Conformance documentation

Product findings are summarized on this page. These assessments are vendor-authored. They are not certifications or ITI certifications, and they are not a claim that every product fully conforms to WCAG 2.2 Level AA.